* Support for same-sex marriage has risen among blacks
* Resignations over resolution
By Deborah Quinn Hensel
HOUSTON, July 12 (Reuters) – The biggest U.S. civil rights
group’s two-month-old decision to support same-sex marriage has
opened rifts at its convention in Houston this week, pitting
religious conservatives against political progressives.
The 103-year-old National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People’s support for same-sex marriage is “a
continuation of its historic commitment to equal protection
under the law,” the organization said in a statement when the
resolution was approved at a board meeting in Miami on May 19.
Since then a furor has erupted among members unrivaled since
the group passed a resolution in 2010 that called on Tea Party
groups to repudiate racist elements within their ranks, said
Anita Russell, a member of the NAACP’s national board and
president of its Kansas City, Missouri, branch.
“But that was from the outside,” she said of the
controversy. “This is internal.”
A few local chapter leaders — and the Reverend Keith
Ratliff of the NAACP national board — resigned because of the
resolution, which passed 10 days after President Barack Obama
announced his support for same-sex marriage.
With his announcement, Obama, who is not attending the NAACP
convention, made a political bet in advance of the Nov. 6
presidential election against likely Republican opponent Mitt
Romney, who addressed convention attendees on Wednesday. Romney
told the audience he will defend “traditional marriage.”
The split in opinions on the resolution was evident among
NAACP members attending this week’s convention. Rashida Martin,
an NAACP chapter officer at Indiana University Bloomington, said
she agreed with the action taken by the country’s largest civil
rights group.
“The world is changing, and we should open our minds a
little,” she said.
The Reverend James Nash, pastor of St. Paul’s Missionary
Baptist Church in Houston, said he disagreed with the resolution
and that many people in his congregation called him to say they
were outraged about the stance taken by both the NAACP and
Obama.
“I’ve got gay people in my congregation, but I would not
marry them,” Nash said. “That’s not the will of God, but who am
I to tell them what lifestyle choices they can make? As a
preacher, I have to preach against that, but I’m not going to
hate on anyone.”
Polls show that there has been an increase in support for
same-sex marriage among Americans. A recent Gallup poll said
that half of Americans believe same-sex couples should be
allowed to marry. Eight states and the District of Columbia
allow same-sex marriage.
But until recently, polls also showed that support for gay
marriage among African-Americans lagged the general population.
The support among blacks has risen since Obama’s announcement,
polls show.
Russell said the resolution is in keeping with the group’s
mission to support equal rights for all people.
“If we explain that enough to our members and supporters,
they will understand why we took the stance we did,” Russell
said. “We’re not asking them to change their beliefs. It’s not a
moral or a religious issue.”
‘HIJACKING CIVIL RIGHTS’
Ratliff, the national board member who resigned in protest,
said at an Iowa statehouse rally last year that “deviant
behavior is not the same thing as being denied the right to vote
because of the color of one’s skin.”
“Gay community, stop hijacking the civil rights movement,”
he said.
Another convention attendee, the Reverend Elston McCowan,
pastor of Star Grace Missionary Baptist Church in St. Louis,
Missouri, said his local chapter and his church both had a mixed
reaction to the resolution. Some people were concerned that the
association had taken such a controversial position, he said.
McCowan declined to say what he thought of the resolution
but noted: “I don’t always agree with every position that the
NAACP takes.”
(Editing by Corrie MacLaggan and Cynthia Osterman)