Skip to content
Chicago Tribune
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

In an April 30 editorial you call for a “thoroughgoing public debate” on the wisdom of recognizing same-sex marriage. You then dismiss the idea in a mere nine sentences, arguing that marriage is “in its essence heterosexual, an institution contrived to bring order and stability to the process of creating and rearing children.”

With respect to marriage being “essentially heterosexual,” it is hard to respond to such a claim other than to note that with this as a starting assumption, it is not difficult to imagine what a thoroughgoing debate would be like (“is not,” “is too”). Wasn’t marriage “essentially” intraracial 35 years ago?

Far from cheapening the institution, recognizing homosexual marriage honors heterosexual marriage by reaffirming its foundation in love and mutual commitment, not sex.